MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/eat.20324

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of eating disorders · 2006

Is multi-impulsive bulimia a distinct type of bulimia nervosa: Psychopathology and EMA findings.

Myers Tricia Cook, Wonderlich Stephen A, Crosby Ross, Mitchell James E, Steffen Kristine J, Smyth Joshua, Miltenberger Raymond

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine if clinically defined multi-impulsive bulimia (MIB) can be validated using an empirical classification approach.

METHOD: One hundred and twenty-five women who met DSM-IV criteria for bulimia nervosa were interviewed and completed a two-week EMA protocol. Participants who reported at least three highly impulsive behaviors were compared to participants who did not report such impulsive behavior. Also, Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was conducted to determine if the MIB classification could be replicated empirically.

RESULTS

LCA produced a two-class solution consistent with the traditional clinical approach to MIB classification. In both approaches, MIB was associated with higher levels of anxiety disorders, child abuse, and daily self-damaging behaviors than the non-MIB class.

CONCLUSION

Clinical classification of MIB was empirically supported through LCA. Although the classes failed to differ in bulimic behavior, MIB appears to represent a group of bulimic individuals with significant trauma histories and associated psychopathology.

Для цитирования: Myers Tricia Cook, Wonderlich Stephen A, Crosby Ross, Mitchell James E, Steffen Kristine J, Smyth Joshua, Miltenberger Raymond. Is multi-impulsive bulimia a distinct type of bulimia nervosa: Psychopathology and EMA findings.. The International journal of eating disorders. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/eat.20324.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.