MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01606470

Медицинская библиотека · Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology · 1989

Prognosis of salivary adenocarcinomas. A retrospective study of 52 cases with special regard to cytochemically assessed nuclear DNA content.

Hamper K, Brügmann M, Caselitz J, Arps H, Berger J, Askensten U, Auer G, Seifert G

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

52 salivary adenocarcinomas of the years 1965-1980 from the files of the Salivary Gland Registry, Institute of Pathology, University of Hamburg, were evaluated retrospectively with regard to clinical follow up and cytochemically assessed nuclear DNA content. The age distribution showed a peak from the 6th to 8th decade (range 3 to 87 years). The m:f ratio was 1:1.36, the mean age was 59.3 years. Over 80% of the tumours were located in the major salivary glands. The clinical course was characterized by metastases present at initial diagnosis (16 cases), subsequent development of metastases (9 cases), local recurrence (15 cases) or death from tumour (10 cases) and was related to differentiation, grade 3 tumours showing the worse clinical courses. In 37 cases, nuclear DNA content was determined by a single scanning cytophotometry device. 28 cases were diploid, 9 were atypical. The clinical course was significantly related to the histogram type, atypical tumours showing a dismal prognosis.

Для цитирования: Hamper K, Brügmann M, Caselitz J, Arps H, Berger J, Askensten U, Auer G, Seifert G. Prognosis of salivary adenocarcinomas. A retrospective study of 52 cases with special regard to cytochemically assessed nuclear DNA content.. Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology. 1989. DOI: 10.1007/bf01606470.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.