The Journal of pediatrics · 2008
Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidoses: opinions of patients and families.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Coman David J, Hayes Ian M, Collins Veronica, Sahhar Margaret, Wraith J Ed, Delatycki Martin B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the opinions of individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) and their parents regarding the use of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).
STUDY DESIGN: A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur.
STUDY DESIGN: A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur.