MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.10.015

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of pediatrics · 2008

Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidoses: opinions of patients and families.

Coman David J, Hayes Ian M, Collins Veronica, Sahhar Margaret, Wraith J Ed, Delatycki Martin B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the opinions of individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) and their parents regarding the use of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

STUDY

DESIGN

A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur.

Для цитирования: Coman David J, Hayes Ian M, Collins Veronica, Sahhar Margaret, Wraith J Ed, Delatycki Martin B. Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidoses: opinions of patients and families.. The Journal of pediatrics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.10.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.