MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.117.008039

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018

Comparison Between Different Strategies of Rheumatic Heart Disease Echocardiographic Screening in Brazil: Data From the PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) Study.

Nascimento Bruno R, Sable Craig, Nunes Maria Carmo P, Diamantino Adriana C, Oliveira Kaciane K B, Oliveira Cassio M, Meira Zilda Maria A, Castilho Sandra Regina T, Santos Júlia P A, Rabelo Letícia Maria M, Lauriano Karlla C A, Carmo Gabriel A L, Tompsett Allison, Ribeiro Antonio Luiz P, Beaton Andrea Z, PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Considering the limited accuracy of clinical examination for early diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), echocardiography has emerged as an important epidemiological tool. The ideal setting for screening is yet to be defined. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of latent RHD in schoolchildren (aged 5-18 years) and to compare effectiveness of screening between public schools, private schools, and primary care centers in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) study uses nonexperts and portable and handheld devices for RHD echocardiographic screening, with remote interpretation by telemedicine, according to the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Compliance with study consent and prevalence were compared between different screening settings, and variables associated with RHD were analyzed. In 26 months, 12 048 students were screened in 52 public schools (n=10 901), 2 private schools (n=589), and 3 primary care centers (n=558). Median age was 12.9 years, and 55.4% were girls. Overall RHD prevalence was 4.0% borderline (n=486) and 0.5% definite (n=63), with statistically similar rates between public schools (4.6%), private schools (3.5%), and primary care centers (4.8%) (P=0.24). The percentage of informed consents signed was higher in primary care centers (84.4%) and private schools (66.9%) compared with public schools (38.7%) (P<0.001). Prevalence was higher in children ≥12 years (5.3% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) and girls (4.9% versus 4.0%; P=0.02). Only age (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.17; P<0.001) was independently associated with RHD.

CONCLUSIONS

RHD screening in primary care centers seems to achieve higher coverage rates. Prevalence among schoolchildren is significantly high, with rates higher than expected in private schools of high-income areas. These data are important for the formulation of public policies to confront RHD.

Для цитирования: Nascimento Bruno R, Sable Craig, Nunes Maria Carmo P, Diamantino Adriana C, Oliveira Kaciane K B, Oliveira Cassio M, Meira Zilda Maria A, Castilho Sandra Regina T, Santos Júlia P A, Rabelo Letícia Maria M, Lauriano Karlla C A, Carmo Gabriel A L, Tompsett Allison, Ribeiro Antonio Luiz P, Beaton Andrea Z, PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) Investigators. Comparison Between Different Strategies of Rheumatic Heart Disease Echocardiographic Screening in Brazil: Data From the PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) Study.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.008039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.