Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2005
Modal reconstruction methods with Zernike polynomials.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schwiegerling Jim
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques for fitting Zernike polynomials to surfaces.
METHODS: Two different methods, Orthogonal Projection and Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization, are compared in terms of speed and performance at fitting a complex object.
RESULTS: Orthogonal Projection provides an extremely rapid fitting of a surface, but leaves residual high frequency noise. The Gram-Schmidt technique provides a more accurate fit of the original object, but consumes much more computing time. Orthogonal Projection, and its associated noise, may be tolerated in classifying corneal topography.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthogonal Projection has a distinct advantage in calculation time over other methods for fitting surfaces. This advantage may be exploited in cases where accurate surface fitting is not necessary, but only general features need to be extracted for classification. If fit accuracy is needed, then slower fitting techniques, such as Gram-Schmidt, should be used.
METHODS: Two different methods, Orthogonal Projection and Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization, are compared in terms of speed and performance at fitting a complex object.
RESULTS: Orthogonal Projection provides an extremely rapid fitting of a surface, but leaves residual high frequency noise. The Gram-Schmidt technique provides a more accurate fit of the original object, but consumes much more computing time. Orthogonal Projection, and its associated noise, may be tolerated in classifying corneal topography.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthogonal Projection has a distinct advantage in calculation time over other methods for fitting surfaces. This advantage may be exploited in cases where accurate surface fitting is not necessary, but only general features need to be extracted for classification. If fit accuracy is needed, then slower fitting techniques, such as Gram-Schmidt, should be used.