MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1383

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology · 2001

Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education.

Kurlan R, McDermott M P, Deeley C, Como P G, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen E M, Miller B

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Based on the knowledge that Tourette's syndrome (TS) is associated with several clinical features that can impair school function and growing evidence that the disorder is much more common than previously thought, the authors hypothesized that TS and related tic disorders would be associated with school problems in the childhood population at large.

METHODS

Direct, blinded (to educational placement) interviews of 1,596 schoolchildren in Monroe County, Rochester, NY, were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven percent of 341 students classified as receiving special education (SpEd) had tics compared with 19.7% (p = 0.008) of 1,255 students in regular classroom programs (RegEd). The weighted prevalence estimates for tics were 23.4% in SpEd and 18.5% in RegEd. A higher percentage of students in SpEd (7.0%) met diagnostic criteria for TS than students in RegEd (3.8%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although possibly influenced by selection bias, our results indicate that tic disorders are common in children and are highly associated with school dysfunction. Tics may represent an identifiable sign of an underlying brain developmental disorder that contributes to academic difficulties.

Для цитирования: Kurlan R, McDermott M P, Deeley C, Como P G, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen E M, Miller B. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education.. Neurology. 2001. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1383.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.