Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2019
Associations between BMI, waist circumference, central obesity and outcomes in type II diabetes mellitus: The ACCORD Trial.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
German Charles A, Laughey Brian, Bertoni Alain G, Yeboah Joseph
Аннотация
AIMS: Our study aimed to investigate associations between BMI, waist circumference (WC), and central obesity (CO) with outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes using data from the ACCORD trial.
METHODS: WC was assessed as a continuous variable. CO was derived as a dichotomous variable using cutoffs from the World Health Organization. BMI was assessed as a continuous and categorical variable using BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2 as normal weight, 25-30 kg/m2 as overweight, and >30 kg/m2 as obese. Incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and all-cause mortality were assessed. Cox proportional hazards were used to assess associations between our predictors and outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: BMI and WC were associated with CHF [HR (95%CI): 1.41 (1.28-1.56), p ≤ 0.001; 1.43 (1.30-1.58), p ≤ 0.001 respectively] and all-cause mortality [HR (95%CI): 1.20 (1.11-1.30), p ≤ 0.001; 1.22 (1.13-1.37), p ≤ 0.001 respectively], though CO was not associated with any outcome after adjustment. No associations were seen between any adiposity metric and ASCVD.
CONCLUSION: Both BMI and WC independently capture the risk associated with adiposity in type 2 diabetes. However, those considered overweight and obese by BMI, and those with CO were not independently associated with outcomes in this cohort.
METHODS: WC was assessed as a continuous variable. CO was derived as a dichotomous variable using cutoffs from the World Health Organization. BMI was assessed as a continuous and categorical variable using BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2 as normal weight, 25-30 kg/m2 as overweight, and >30 kg/m2 as obese. Incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and all-cause mortality were assessed. Cox proportional hazards were used to assess associations between our predictors and outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: BMI and WC were associated with CHF [HR (95%CI): 1.41 (1.28-1.56), p ≤ 0.001; 1.43 (1.30-1.58), p ≤ 0.001 respectively] and all-cause mortality [HR (95%CI): 1.20 (1.11-1.30), p ≤ 0.001; 1.22 (1.13-1.37), p ≤ 0.001 respectively], though CO was not associated with any outcome after adjustment. No associations were seen between any adiposity metric and ASCVD.
CONCLUSION: Both BMI and WC independently capture the risk associated with adiposity in type 2 diabetes. However, those considered overweight and obese by BMI, and those with CO were not independently associated with outcomes in this cohort.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdiposityAgedAntihypertensive AgentsAtherosclerosisBody Mass IndexCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedObesity, AbdominalPrognosisWaist Circumference