MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jmri.23904

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2012

Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations.

Versluis Maarten J, Teeuwisse Wouter M, Kan Hermien E, van Buchem Mark A, Webb Andrew G, van Osch Matthias J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the subjective experiences and the sources of discomfort for subjects undergoing 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations on a whole-body 7 T system in a hospital setting

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A postscan survey was filled out by 101 healthy subjects who participated in a 7 T examination. All participants answered questions regarding different potential sensations of discomfort including dizziness, claustrophobia, and scanner noise.

RESULTS

Dizziness was reported most frequently, with 34% of subjects experiencing dizziness while moving into the scanner and 30% while moving out of the magnet. Scanner noise was also frequently mentioned as uncomfortable (33% of the subjects). In 11% of the cases a metallic taste was reported. The overall experience was rated by 3% as unpleasant, 51% as neutral, and 46% as pleasant.

CONCLUSION

The reported side effects are larger than previously reported for lower field strengths. However, overall, 7 T examinations are well tolerated, with only 3% of subjects rating it as unpleasant. These results agree well with previous in-depth studies, and provide further evidence that 7 T MRI would be accepted by patients in clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Versluis Maarten J, Teeuwisse Wouter M, Kan Hermien E, van Buchem Mark A, Webb Andrew G, van Osch Matthias J. Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations.. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2012. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23904.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.