Ophthalmology · 2022
Effectiveness of Laser Refractive Surgery to Address Anisometropic Amblyogenic Refractive Error in Children: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cavuoto Kara M, Chang Melinda Y, Heidary Gena, Morrison David G, Trivedi Rupal H, Binenbaum Gil, Kim Stephen J, Pineles Stacy L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the safety and effectiveness of laser refractive surgery to treat anisometropic amblyogenic refractive error in children aged ≤ 18 years.
METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted in October 2021 with no date limitations and restricted to publications in English. The search yielded 137 articles, 69 of which were reviewed in full text. Eleven articles met the criteria for inclusion and were assigned a level of evidence rating.
RESULTS: The 11 included articles were all level III evidence and consisted of 1 case-control study and 10 case series. Six studies used laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), 1 used photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), 1 used refractive lenticule extraction/small incision lenticule extraction, and the rest used a combination of LASIK, PRK, laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), or refractive lenticule extraction/small incision lenticule extraction. Five studies enrolled patients with anisometropic myopia, 2 studies enrolled patients with anisometropic hyperopia, and the remainder were mixed. Although all studies demonstrated an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the magnitude of improvement varied widely. As study parameters varied, a successful outcome was defined as residual refractive error of 1 diopter (D) or less of the target refraction because this was the most commonly used metric. Successful outcomes ranged between 38% and 87%, with a mean follow-up ranging from 4 months to 7 years. Despite this wide range, all studies demonstrated an improvement in the magnitude of anisometropia. Regression in refractive error occurred more frequently and to a greater degree in myopic eyes and eyes with longer follow-up, and in younger patients. Although one study reported 2 free flaps, most studies reported no serious adverse events. The most common complications were corneal haze and striae.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from included studies suggest that laser refractive surgery may address amblyogenic refractive error in children and that it appears to decrease anisometropia. However, the evidence for improvement in amblyopia is unclear and long-term safety data are lacking. Long-term data and well-designed clinical studies that use newer refractive technologies in standardized patient populations would help address the role of refractive surgery in children and its potential impact on amblyopia.
METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted in October 2021 with no date limitations and restricted to publications in English. The search yielded 137 articles, 69 of which were reviewed in full text. Eleven articles met the criteria for inclusion and were assigned a level of evidence rating.
RESULTS: The 11 included articles were all level III evidence and consisted of 1 case-control study and 10 case series. Six studies used laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), 1 used photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), 1 used refractive lenticule extraction/small incision lenticule extraction, and the rest used a combination of LASIK, PRK, laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), or refractive lenticule extraction/small incision lenticule extraction. Five studies enrolled patients with anisometropic myopia, 2 studies enrolled patients with anisometropic hyperopia, and the remainder were mixed. Although all studies demonstrated an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the magnitude of improvement varied widely. As study parameters varied, a successful outcome was defined as residual refractive error of 1 diopter (D) or less of the target refraction because this was the most commonly used metric. Successful outcomes ranged between 38% and 87%, with a mean follow-up ranging from 4 months to 7 years. Despite this wide range, all studies demonstrated an improvement in the magnitude of anisometropia. Regression in refractive error occurred more frequently and to a greater degree in myopic eyes and eyes with longer follow-up, and in younger patients. Although one study reported 2 free flaps, most studies reported no serious adverse events. The most common complications were corneal haze and striae.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from included studies suggest that laser refractive surgery may address amblyogenic refractive error in children and that it appears to decrease anisometropia. However, the evidence for improvement in amblyopia is unclear and long-term safety data are lacking. Long-term data and well-designed clinical studies that use newer refractive technologies in standardized patient populations would help address the role of refractive surgery in children and its potential impact on amblyopia.