Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2007
A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Katory M, Tang C L, Koh W L, Fook-Chong S M C, Loi T T, Ooi B S, Ho K S, Eu K W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: High anterior resection (HAR) for colorectal cancer is traditionally performed with routine mobilization of the splenic flexure. This is a retrospective review of mortality and morbidity following HAR in which the splenic flexure has been preserved.
METHOD: From a prospective database, all patients who had undergone elective HAR for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2005 were identified. Morbidity, mortality, pathology and survival data for patients having HAR with and without splenic flexure mobilization were analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 707 patients were identified. Five hundred and thirty-one had HAR with preservation of the splenic flexure. In these patients outcome was: anastomotic leak (0.4%), wound infection (3.6%), anastomotic stricture (0.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9%). No statistical significant difference was found for postoperative morbidity (P = 0.1926), 30-day mortality (P =0.3285), lymph node harvest (P = 0.2127) or survival (P = 0.1457) compared with patients in whom the splenic flexure was mobilized. Longitudinal resection margins were greater following HAR with splenic flexure mobilization (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: No morbidity, oncological or survival disadvantage in performing splenic flexure preserving HAR was found.
METHOD: From a prospective database, all patients who had undergone elective HAR for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2005 were identified. Morbidity, mortality, pathology and survival data for patients having HAR with and without splenic flexure mobilization were analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 707 patients were identified. Five hundred and thirty-one had HAR with preservation of the splenic flexure. In these patients outcome was: anastomotic leak (0.4%), wound infection (3.6%), anastomotic stricture (0.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9%). No statistical significant difference was found for postoperative morbidity (P = 0.1926), 30-day mortality (P =0.3285), lymph node harvest (P = 0.2127) or survival (P = 0.1457) compared with patients in whom the splenic flexure was mobilized. Longitudinal resection margins were greater following HAR with splenic flexure mobilization (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: No morbidity, oncological or survival disadvantage in performing splenic flexure preserving HAR was found.