Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2020
Novel Non-Invasive Index for Prediction of Responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using High-Resolution Magnetocardiography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakashima Takahiro, Usami Shunsuke, Aiba Takeshi, Oishi Shogo, Kimura Yoshitaka, Kawakami Shoji, Yamada-Inoue Yuko, Ogata Soshiro, Ueda Nobuhiko, Nakajima Kenzaburo, Kamakura Tsukasa, Wada Mitsuru, Yamagata Kenichiro, Ishibashi Kohei, Miyamoto Koji, Noda Takashi, Nagase Satoshi, Kanzaki Hideaki, Izumi Chisato, Yasuda Satoshi, Kamakura Shiro, Takaki Hiroshi, Sugimachi Masaru, Kusano Kengo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the left ventricular (LV) conduction pattern on magnetocardiography (MCG) can predict CRT responders.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled 56 patients with advanced HF (mean [±SD] LV ejection fraction [LVEF] 23±8%; QRS duration 145±19 ms) and MCG recorded before CRT. MCG-QRS current arrow maps were classified as multidirectional (MDC; n=28) or unidirectional (UDC; n=28) conduction based on a change of either ≥35° or <35°, respectively, in the direction of the maximal current arrow after the QRS peak. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF were comparable between the 2 groups, but QRS duration was longer and the presence of complete left bundle branch block and LV dyssynchrony was higher in the UDC than MDC group. Six months after CRT, 30 patients were defined as responders, with significantly more in the UDC than MDC group (89% vs. 14%, respectively; P<0.001). Over a 5-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that adverse cardiac events (death or implantation of an LV assist device) were less frequently observed in the UDC than MDC group (6/28 vs. 15/28, respectively; P=0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that UDC on MCG was the most significant predictor of CRT response (odds ratio 69.8; 95% confidence interval 13.14-669.32; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative non-invasive MCG may predict the CRT response and long-term outcome after CRT.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled 56 patients with advanced HF (mean [±SD] LV ejection fraction [LVEF] 23±8%; QRS duration 145±19 ms) and MCG recorded before CRT. MCG-QRS current arrow maps were classified as multidirectional (MDC; n=28) or unidirectional (UDC; n=28) conduction based on a change of either ≥35° or <35°, respectively, in the direction of the maximal current arrow after the QRS peak. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF were comparable between the 2 groups, but QRS duration was longer and the presence of complete left bundle branch block and LV dyssynchrony was higher in the UDC than MDC group. Six months after CRT, 30 patients were defined as responders, with significantly more in the UDC than MDC group (89% vs. 14%, respectively; P<0.001). Over a 5-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that adverse cardiac events (death or implantation of an LV assist device) were less frequently observed in the UDC than MDC group (6/28 vs. 15/28, respectively; P=0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that UDC on MCG was the most significant predictor of CRT response (odds ratio 69.8; 95% confidence interval 13.14-669.32; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative non-invasive MCG may predict the CRT response and long-term outcome after CRT.