The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2001
Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom--the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 4: outcome comparisons, training, and conclusions.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bearn D, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, Murray J J, Sell D, Shaw W C, Williams A C, Sandy J R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: A critical appraisal of cleft care in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: All National Health Service cleft centers in the United Kingdom.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Children born with unilateral complete clefts of the lip and palate between April 1, 1982, and March 31, 1984 (12-year-olds), and April 1, 1989, and March 31, 1991 (5-year-olds). Newly appointed and senior cleft clinicians.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skeletal pattern, dental arch relationship, success of alveolar bone grafting, dental health, facial appearance, oral health status, patient/parent satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights the poor outcomes for the fragmented cleft care in the United Kingdom, compared with European centers. There is an urgent need for a review of structure, organization, and training.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: All National Health Service cleft centers in the United Kingdom.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Children born with unilateral complete clefts of the lip and palate between April 1, 1982, and March 31, 1984 (12-year-olds), and April 1, 1989, and March 31, 1991 (5-year-olds). Newly appointed and senior cleft clinicians.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skeletal pattern, dental arch relationship, success of alveolar bone grafting, dental health, facial appearance, oral health status, patient/parent satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights the poor outcomes for the fragmented cleft care in the United Kingdom, compared with European centers. There is an urgent need for a review of structure, organization, and training.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AlveoloplastyAttitude of Health PersonnelBone TransplantationChi-Square DistributionChildChild, PreschoolCleft LipCleft PalateCohort StudiesDental ArchEstheticsEuropeHealth StatusHumansMalocclusionMaxillofacial DevelopmentMedical AuditOral FistulaOral HealthOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionQuality Assurance, Health CareRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricSurgery, OralSurgery, PlasticTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom