m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022

Characterization of interaction between blood coagulation factor VIII and LRP1 suggests dynamic binding by alternating complex contacts.

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Chun Haarin, Kurasawa James H, Olivares Philip, Marakasova Ekaterina S, Shestopal Svetlana A, Hassink Gabriela U, Karnaukhova Elena, Migliorini Mary, Obi Juliet O, Smith Ally K, Wintrode Patrick L, Durai Prasannavenkatesh, Park Keunwan, Deredge Daniel, Strickland Dudley K, Sarafanov Andrey G

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Deficiency in blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) results in life-threating bleeding (hemophilia A) treated by infusions of FVIII concentrates. To improve disease treatment, FVIII has been modified to increase its plasma half-life, which requires understanding mechanisms of FVIII catabolism. An important catabolic actor is hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), which also regulates many other clinically significant processes. Previous studies showed complexity of FVIII site for binding LRP1.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize binding sites between FVIII and LRP1 and suggest a model of the interaction.

METHODS: A series of recombinant ligand-binding complement-type repeat (CR) fragments of LRP1 including mutated variants was generated in a baculovirus system and tested for FVIII interaction using surface plasmon resonance, tissue culture model, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, and in silico.

RESULTS: Multiple CR doublets within LRP1 clusters II and IV were identified as alternative FVIII-binding sites. These interactions follow the canonical binding mode providing major binding energy, and additional weak interactions are contributed by adjacent CR domains. A representative CR doublet was shown to have multiple contact sites on FVIII.

CONCLUSIONS: FVIII and LRP1 interact via formation of multiple complex contacts involving both canonical and non-canonical binding combinations. We propose that FVIII-LRP1 interaction occurs via switching such alternative binding combinations in a dynamic mode, and that this mechanism is relevant to other ligand interactions of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family members including LRP1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH