Differences Between Adult and Pediatric Periorbital Cellulitis Secondary to Acute Rhinosinusitis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical differences between adult and pediatric patients presenting with periorbital cellulitis secondary to acute rhinosinusitis (ARS).
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING
Tertiary academic medical center.
METHODS
Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute periorbital cellulitis secondary to ARS from 2012 to 2022 were reviewed, to include past medical history, treatment, hospital length of stay (LoS), and readmission rates.
RESULTS
About 163 patients were identified on chart review and included of which 80 were adults (age > 18). Mean age in the pediatric cohort was 6.4 (±4.6) years versus 49.2 (±18.5) years in the adult cohort. Both adults and children had similar computed tomography (CT) Lund-Mackay scores (9.2 vs 10.2, P = .191 respectively) and similar incidence of postseptal cellulitis (68.8% vs 65.1%, P = .617 respectively). The adult patients were more likely to require surgical treatment (45% vs 21.7%, P = .002), more likely to have neurological complications (11.3% vs 0%, P = .002), had longer hospital stay (LoS; 6.9 days vs 3.6 days, P = .002), and more likely to require readmission within 30 days (16.3% vs 6%, P = .037). Multivariate analyses showed that the adult population was independently associated with requiring surgical treatment (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.3-6) but not with a longer hospital LoS (Coef 1.1, 95% CI = -0.5 to 2.7).
CONCLUSIONS
Adult patients presenting with acute periorbital cellulitis secondary to ARS are more likely to need surgical intervention and more likely to have longer hospital stay. Longer hospital stay in adult patients may be secondary to sequelae of the infection such as neurological complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.