MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Allergologia et immunopathologia · 2000

[Diagnostic clinical trial in children using an allergenic extract of Blomia tropicalis].

Rodríguez O, Labrada A

Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Blomia tropicalis is a mite that is one of the most important causes of allergic sensitization in studies of tropical and subtropical regions. Nonetheless, there are no published studies of the sensitivity and specificity of B. tropicalis extracts.

METHOD: An open, non-randomized study was carried out in 205 asthmatic children and in 205 non-asthmatic children, both groups with an age range of 1 to 14 years. Duplicate skin prick tests were made using allergen extracts standardized by biological units and positive and negative controls. The test was considered positive when the average diameter of the wheal was > or = 3 mm and negative when it was < 3 mm. The validity of the test was estimated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

The skin prick test was positive in 82.92% of the asthmatic children and in 10.7% of the non-asthmatic children, yielding a sensitivity of 82.9%, 95% CI 76.9; 87.7 and a specificity of 89.3%, 95% IC 84.0; 93.0. The positive predictive value was 88.5%, 95% IC 83.0; 92.5 and the negative predictive value was 83.9%, 95% IC 78.2; 88.4.

CONCLUSIONS

Blomia tropicalis is an important cause of bronchial asthma among the children of the northern Camagüey region.

Для цитирования: Rodríguez O, Labrada A. [Diagnostic clinical trial in children using an allergenic extract of Blomia tropicalis].. Allergologia et immunopathologia. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.