European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
Perioperative and postoperative management of tympanostomy tube insertion: a survey of otorhinolaryngologists in Israel.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dudkiewicz Dean, Bismuth Efrat Miryam, Tsur Nir, Gilony Dror, Hod Roy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tympanostomy tube insertion is a standard surgical procedure in children to address middle ear infections and effusion-related hearing and speech development issues. Perioperative treatments like ear drops containing antibiotics, steroids, and tube irrigation with saline aim to prevent complications, yet no universal gold standard treatment exists. Despite guidelines, practice preferences among ENT specialists vary, motivating this study to investigate perioperative management practices in Israel.
METHOD: A survey was distributed among ENT surgeons, collecting data on their main workplace, sub-specialty, preoperative hearing test requirements, tube irrigation practices, tube selection criteria, and timing of tube removal. Distribution and association with main workplaces were examined.
RESULTS: The survey achieved a response rate of 27.33%. Most participants routinely required preoperative hearing tests, with a preference for conducting them within three months prior to surgery (62.2%). Tube irrigation during the procedure was less common among surgeons in the public system (p = 0.007). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of respondents maintained their established practices (96.3%), while a small proportion (3.7%) adapted by replacing two in-person meetings with one virtual session. Variations in tube removal timing based on the main workplace were noted, with private practitioners opting for earlier removal (p = 0.002) and were less permissive in water deprivation practices (p = 0.053).
CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the practices and preferences of ENT surgeons in tympanostomy tube insertion procedures in Israel. Adherence to standardized practices was observed, with variations influenced by the primary workplace. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, minimal changes were made to established practices. Further research and consensus are necessary to optimize patient outcomes and develop tailored guidelines in this field.
METHOD: A survey was distributed among ENT surgeons, collecting data on their main workplace, sub-specialty, preoperative hearing test requirements, tube irrigation practices, tube selection criteria, and timing of tube removal. Distribution and association with main workplaces were examined.
RESULTS: The survey achieved a response rate of 27.33%. Most participants routinely required preoperative hearing tests, with a preference for conducting them within three months prior to surgery (62.2%). Tube irrigation during the procedure was less common among surgeons in the public system (p = 0.007). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of respondents maintained their established practices (96.3%), while a small proportion (3.7%) adapted by replacing two in-person meetings with one virtual session. Variations in tube removal timing based on the main workplace were noted, with private practitioners opting for earlier removal (p = 0.002) and were less permissive in water deprivation practices (p = 0.053).
CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the practices and preferences of ENT surgeons in tympanostomy tube insertion procedures in Israel. Adherence to standardized practices was observed, with variations influenced by the primary workplace. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, minimal changes were made to established practices. Further research and consensus are necessary to optimize patient outcomes and develop tailored guidelines in this field.