Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017
Role of dual red imaging to guide intravariceal sclerotherapy injection of esophageal varices (with videos).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Furuichi Yoshihiro, Gotoda Takuji, Kasai Yoshitaka, Takeuchi Hirohito, Yoshimasu Yuu, Kawai Takashi, Itoi Takao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dual red imaging (DRI) is a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technique that can increase the visibility and predict the depth of esophageal varices (EVs). The recurrence rate of EVs after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) reportedly decreases by intravariceal injection of a sclerosant. We evaluated prospectively whether the EIS success rate was increased by DRI compared with the white-light imaging (WLI) mode.
METHODS: A total of 79 patients with EVs were randomly divided into the DRI (n = 40) and WLI (n = 39) groups. The primary endpoint was the success rate of intravariceal injection on the first EIS puncture. The secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate. A variable puncture needle was used, and the length was adjusted according to the EV visibility change by DRI. In the WLI group, DRI was not used.
RESULTS: The success rate of the first puncture was significantly higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (80.0% vs 46.2%; P = .0018). The cumulative recurrence rate was significantly lower in the DRI group (P = .031). The sum of the depth and luminal diameter of EVs was investigated by EUS. The Pearson correlation coefficient between this value and the needle length was higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (r = 0.878 vs 0.603).
CONCLUSIONS: DRI increased the EIS success rate and decreased the recurrence rate. This resulted from the puncture needle adjustment to the appropriate length via EV depth prediction by DRI.
METHODS: A total of 79 patients with EVs were randomly divided into the DRI (n = 40) and WLI (n = 39) groups. The primary endpoint was the success rate of intravariceal injection on the first EIS puncture. The secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate. A variable puncture needle was used, and the length was adjusted according to the EV visibility change by DRI. In the WLI group, DRI was not used.
RESULTS: The success rate of the first puncture was significantly higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (80.0% vs 46.2%; P = .0018). The cumulative recurrence rate was significantly lower in the DRI group (P = .031). The sum of the depth and luminal diameter of EVs was investigated by EUS. The Pearson correlation coefficient between this value and the needle length was higher in the DRI group than in the WLI group (r = 0.878 vs 0.603).
CONCLUSIONS: DRI increased the EIS success rate and decreased the recurrence rate. This resulted from the puncture needle adjustment to the appropriate length via EV depth prediction by DRI.