ECTOPIC trial: The efficacy of flEcainide Compared To metOprolol in reducing Premature ventrIcular Contractions: A randomized open-label crossover study in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND

Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in children are usually considered benign. Symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction are indications for treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of flecainide vs metoprolol in reducing PVCs in children.

METHODS

A randomized open-label crossover trial was conducted of children with a PVC burden of >15% on Holter monitoring successively treated with metoprolol and flecainide, or vice versa, with a drug-free interval of at least 2 weeks. Holter measurements were repeated before and after the start of the antiarrhythmic drug.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were screened; 19 patients could be included. Median age was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 5.5 years). Mean baseline PVC burden was 21.7% (n = 18; SD ± 14.0) before the start of flecainide and 21.2% (n = 17; SD ± 11.5) before the start of metoprolol. In a mixed model analysis, the estimated mean reduction in PVC burden was 10.6 percentage points (95% CI, 5.8-15.3) for flecainide and 2.4 percentage points (95% CI,2.7-7.5) for metoprolol, with a significant difference of 8.2 percentage points (95% CI, 0.86-15.46; P = .031). Exploratory analysis revealed that 9 of 18 patients treated with flecainide and 1 of 17 patients treated with metoprolol had a reduction to a PVC burden below 5%. No discriminating factors between flecainide responders and nonresponders were found; the mean plasma level was not significantly different (0.34 mg/L vs 0.52 mg/L; P = .277).

CONCLUSION

In children with frequent PVCs, flecainide led to a significantly greater reduction of PVC burden compared with metoprolol. Flecainide was effective in only a subgroup of patients, which appears to be unrelated to the plasma level.