From NAFLD to MASLD: When metabolic comorbidity matters.

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

In a recent development, a cohort of hepatologists has proposed altering the nomenclature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), accompanied by modified diagnostic criteria. Our objective was to investigate the effect of the revised definition on identifying significant hepatic fibrosis.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

From Jan 2009 to Dec 2022, a total of 428 patients with biopsy-proven hepatic steatosis were diagnosed with NAFLD. Patients were classified into subgroups according to MASLD and Cryptogenic-SLD diagnostic criteria. The clinical pathological features were compared between these two groups. Risk factors for significant fibrosis were analysed in the MASLD group. In total, 329 (76.9 %) patients were diagnosed with MASLD, and 99 (23.1 %) were diagnosed with Cryptogenic-SLD.

RESULTS

Those with MASLD exhibited a higher degree of disease severity regarding histology features than Cryptogenic-SLD. The prevalence of significant fibrosis increased from 13 % to 26.6 % for one and two criteria present to 42.5 % for meeting three or more cardiometabolic risk factor (CMRF) criteria (p = 0.001). ALB (aOR:0.94,95 %CI:0.90-1.00; p = 0.030), lower levels of PLT (aOR:0.99, 95 %CI:0.99-1.00; p < 0.001), and more metabolic comorbidities (aOR:1.42,95 %CI:1.14-1.78; p = 0.012) were independent risk factors of significant fibrosis in MASLD.

CONCLUSIONS

The new nomenclature of MASLD and SLD is more applicable to identifying significant fibrosis than NAFLD. Patients with three or more cardiometabolic risk factors are at higher risk of fibrosis.