MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1308/003588414x14055925060154

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015

Delay in diagnosis and lessons learnt from a case of abdominal wall abscess caused by fishbone perforation.

Hakeem A, Shanmugam V, Badrinath K, Dube M, Panto P

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Complications following foreign body (FB) ingestion are an uncommon clinical problem. A 59-year-old man presented with a 4-week history of left iliac fossa pain and 1 episode of dark red blood mixed with stools. Inflammatory markers were elevated, and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis showed an ill defined abdominal wall inflammatory collection in close contact with the small bowel loops. He was treated with antibiotics, and follow-up CT, colonoscopy and small bowel enema were mostly unremarkable. The patient presented again ten months later with left iliac fossa cellulitis and fever. Multiplanar CT (the patient's fourth scan) demonstrated a 10cm abdominal wall collection with a linear hyperdense structure in the collection. The radiologists suspected a FB and on close scrutiny of the previous scans, they noted it to have been present on all of them. A targeted incision led to the removal of a 3cm fishbone from the collection. This case highlights the need to consider the possibility of a FB being the underlying cause in any unexplained intra-abdominal or abdominal wall inflammatory process so that the diagnosis is made in a timely manner.

Для цитирования: Hakeem A, Shanmugam V, Badrinath K, Dube M, Panto P. Delay in diagnosis and lessons learnt from a case of abdominal wall abscess caused by fishbone perforation.. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2015. DOI: 10.1308/003588414x14055925060154.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.