Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2023
Effect of alveolar ridge preservation on peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis prevalence: A multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buonocunto Nino, Cinquini Chiara, Mijiritsky Eitan, Tagger-Green Nirit, Porreca Annamaria, Di Nicola Marta, Iezzi Giovanna, Barone Antonio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is a procedure with the aim to reduce bone resorption that occurs after tooth extraction, facilitating the following implant placement. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis around implants inserted in sites treated with ARP and to investigate possible risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received at least one dental implant inserted in a grafted socket were considered eligible for this study. Patients were recalled for a follow-up visit; medical history, clinical and demographic data were collected. Univariate logistic regression analyses have been performed for both implant-level and patient-level variables. Indeed, moderation analysis was used to investigate the indirect relationship between age and marginal bone level.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients who received 61 implants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Thirty-three implants were classified as "Работает" (54.1%), 23 implants showed signs of peri-implant mucositis (37.7%), and 5 implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis (8.2%). Data analyzed at the patient level showed that 49% of the patients were healthy, 45.1% of the patients had mucositis and 5.9% of the patients were affected by peri-implantitis. Mandibular sites and type III grafted sockets showed a significant association with peri-implantitis; in addition, a history of periodontitis and an increase in age showed higher risks of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants inserted in grafted sockets showed favorable rates of healthy implants in the long term.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ridge preservation procedures do not seem to increase the risk of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received at least one dental implant inserted in a grafted socket were considered eligible for this study. Patients were recalled for a follow-up visit; medical history, clinical and demographic data were collected. Univariate logistic regression analyses have been performed for both implant-level and patient-level variables. Indeed, moderation analysis was used to investigate the indirect relationship between age and marginal bone level.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients who received 61 implants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Thirty-three implants were classified as "Работает" (54.1%), 23 implants showed signs of peri-implant mucositis (37.7%), and 5 implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis (8.2%). Data analyzed at the patient level showed that 49% of the patients were healthy, 45.1% of the patients had mucositis and 5.9% of the patients were affected by peri-implantitis. Mandibular sites and type III grafted sockets showed a significant association with peri-implantitis; in addition, a history of periodontitis and an increase in age showed higher risks of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants inserted in grafted sockets showed favorable rates of healthy implants in the long term.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ridge preservation procedures do not seem to increase the risk of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis.