DOI 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.07.014
Intrathoracic neurogenic tumors--50 years' experience in a Japanese institution.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Intrathoracic neurogenic tumors are relatively uncommon, and there have been few reports regarding their entire clinical characteristics in the Asian population.
OBJECTIVES
We retrospectively reviewed our Japanese institutional experience of intrathoracic neurogenic tumors, with emphasis on the clinical spectrum.
METHODS
We analyzed the records of 146 patients with intrathoracic neurogenic tumors who were treated over the past 50 years. There were 60 pediatric and 86 adult patients (74 males and 72 females).
RESULTS
There were 51 ganglioneuromas, 37 schwannomas, 30 neurofibromas, 18 neuroblstomas, 5 gangliobastomas, and 5 others, of which 136 cases were located in the posterior mediastinum, 9 in the chest wall, and 1 in the lung parenchyma. Neurogenic tumors were most commonly seen as a pediatric mediastinal tumor (46.2%), as compared to 11.2% in the adult population (P<0.001). Eighty-four percent of adult patients and 60% of pediatric patients were asymptomatic. In thirteen patients (8.9%), the tumor showed an intraspinal extension, the so-called dumbbell-type. Overall, 20.5% of the neoplasms were malignant, occurring predominantly in the first 5 years of life. Complete resection was performed in 95.7% cases for benign tumors and 63.3% for malignant tumors, including a laminectomy for six cases of the dumbbell-type. There were no operative deaths and minimal morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS
Age seemed to be the most important clinical parameter for distinguishing between histological type and rate of malignancy for neurogenic tumors. Recognition of this clinical spectrum will lead to the immediate and appropriate surgical intervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.