Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2000
Reconstruction after total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy. Comparison of elongated stomach roll with microvascular anastomosis with gastric pull up reconstruction or something like that.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sagawa N, Okushiba S, Ono K, Ito K, Morikawa T, Kondo S, Katoh H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We have performed total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy in case of double cancer, head-neck and thoracic esophageal cancer, or cervical esophageal cancer that extended down to the level of aortic arch. The procedure is very challenging.
METHODS: From April 1984 to May 1998, 14 patients underwent the procedures for double cancer of head-neck and thoracic esophagus (n=10), hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancer (n=3), and synchronous esophageal cancer (n=1). The grafts used were whole stomach (n=6), elongated stomach roll (n=5), and stomach roll with free jejunum (n=3). The routes of reconstruction were posterior mediastinum (n=10), antesternal (n=3), and retrosternal (n=1).
RESULTS: Elongated stomach roll with microvascular anastomoses was long enough for reconstruction and the blood supply of the graft was sufficient. There was no fatal complication in this procedure. Oral feeding was achieved in 13 (93%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The elongated stomach roll with microvascular anastomosis is efficient and the placement of the conduit in the posterior mediastinum is recommended to allow a better alimentary comfort in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.
METHODS: From April 1984 to May 1998, 14 patients underwent the procedures for double cancer of head-neck and thoracic esophagus (n=10), hypopharyngeal or cervical esophageal cancer (n=3), and synchronous esophageal cancer (n=1). The grafts used were whole stomach (n=6), elongated stomach roll (n=5), and stomach roll with free jejunum (n=3). The routes of reconstruction were posterior mediastinum (n=10), antesternal (n=3), and retrosternal (n=1).
RESULTS: Elongated stomach roll with microvascular anastomoses was long enough for reconstruction and the blood supply of the graft was sufficient. There was no fatal complication in this procedure. Oral feeding was achieved in 13 (93%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The elongated stomach roll with microvascular anastomosis is efficient and the placement of the conduit in the posterior mediastinum is recommended to allow a better alimentary comfort in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.