Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 1999
Effects of central corneal thickness on measurement of intra-ocular pressure in keratoconus and post-keratoplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel S, McLaughlin J M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To measure and compare central corneal thickness (CT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in keratoconus and post-keratoplasty subjects and examine the CT-IOP relationship.
METHODS: 22 keratoconus (category I: six female sixteen male, average age 27.0 range 12-47) and 19 post-keratoplasty (category II: ten female nine male average age 34.6 range 16-54) patients without other anterior segment conditions were recruited. Only one, non-contact lens wearing, eye of the patient was included for analysis. Cornea was anaesthetised with non-preserved 0.4% Benoxinate Hydrochloride. Using a randomised approach, CT was measured using a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. IOP was then measured using a standard Goldmann tonometer. At all times the tonometrist remained unaware of the corneal thickness values.
RESULTS: The mean (+/- s.d.) values for CT and IOP respectively in the two categories were: (I), 445 (45) mu and 9.8 (2.3) mmHg, (II), 564(44) microns and 15.8 (3.9) mmHg. Differences between I and II for both CT and IOP were significant (t-test, p = 0.01). Within each category, a significant correlation between CT and IOP was not found. Pooling all pairs of data (n = 41) a significant relationship between CT and IOP was detected (r = 0.635, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The results confirm the hypothesis that an eye with a thicker cornea tends to present with a higher measured IOP. In the management of keratoconus and other corneal surgical procedures, changes in CT will contribute to any apparent changes in measured IOP.
METHODS: 22 keratoconus (category I: six female sixteen male, average age 27.0 range 12-47) and 19 post-keratoplasty (category II: ten female nine male average age 34.6 range 16-54) patients without other anterior segment conditions were recruited. Only one, non-contact lens wearing, eye of the patient was included for analysis. Cornea was anaesthetised with non-preserved 0.4% Benoxinate Hydrochloride. Using a randomised approach, CT was measured using a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. IOP was then measured using a standard Goldmann tonometer. At all times the tonometrist remained unaware of the corneal thickness values.
RESULTS: The mean (+/- s.d.) values for CT and IOP respectively in the two categories were: (I), 445 (45) mu and 9.8 (2.3) mmHg, (II), 564(44) microns and 15.8 (3.9) mmHg. Differences between I and II for both CT and IOP were significant (t-test, p = 0.01). Within each category, a significant correlation between CT and IOP was not found. Pooling all pairs of data (n = 41) a significant relationship between CT and IOP was detected (r = 0.635, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The results confirm the hypothesis that an eye with a thicker cornea tends to present with a higher measured IOP. In the management of keratoconus and other corneal surgical procedures, changes in CT will contribute to any apparent changes in measured IOP.