MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1413-81232010000200008

Медицинская библиотека · Ciencia & saude coletiva · 2010

[Prevalence and severity of gingivitis among scholars (7-14 years): local conditions associated to bleeding on probing].

Chambrone Leandro, Macedo Sergio Bassit, Ramalho Francisco Cardoso, Trevizani Filho Eduardo, Chambrone Luiz Armando

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The objective of this study was to collect data about the prevalence and severity of gingivitis in a sample of scholars, as well as its relationship with possible local risk factors. Two hundred and six subjects were examined, 107 male and 99 female, with age ranging from 7 to 14 years, where data from their Plaque Index (IP), Gingival Index (IG), and Clinical Probing Depth (PCS) were collected. Among all the clinical parameters observed, the mean values found referent to PCS, IP and IG were 1.58 + 0.46, 1.12 + 0.49 and 0.89 + 0.32, respectively. Ninety five subjects (46.1%) presented a diagnostic of slight gingivitis and 111 (53.9%) of moderate gingivitis. Overall, male subjects presented statistically more dental plaque and more gingival inflammation than female subjects. Clinical signs of gingival inflammation were found in all the examined subjects. Gingivitis severity around permanent teeth was directly linked to the amount of dental plaque deposits and to the presence of bleeding on probing.

Для цитирования: Chambrone Leandro, Macedo Sergio Bassit, Ramalho Francisco Cardoso, Trevizani Filho Eduardo, Chambrone Luiz Armando. [Prevalence and severity of gingivitis among scholars (7-14 years): local conditions associated to bleeding on probing].. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2010. DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000200008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.