Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN · 2011
Comparing methods of determining insertion length for placing gastric tubes in children 1 month to 17 years of age.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ellett Marsha L Cirgin, Cohen Mervyn D, Perkins Susan M, Croffie Joseph M B, Lane Kathleen A, Austin Joan K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare three methods of predicting the gastric tube insertion length in children 1 month to 17 years of age: age-related, height-based (ARHB); nose-ear-xiphoid (NEX); and nose-ear-mid-umbilicus (NEMU).
DESIGN AND METHODS: The design was a randomized controlled trial. Children were randomly assigned to the ARHB, NEX, or NEMU groups. Tubes placed high were considered to be misplaced.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in percentages of correctly placed tubes, with ARHB and NEMU being more accurate than NEX.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: NEX should no longer be used as a gastric tube insertion-length predictor. Either ARHB or NEMU should be used.
DESIGN AND METHODS: The design was a randomized controlled trial. Children were randomly assigned to the ARHB, NEX, or NEMU groups. Tubes placed high were considered to be misplaced.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in percentages of correctly placed tubes, with ARHB and NEMU being more accurate than NEX.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: NEX should no longer be used as a gastric tube insertion-length predictor. Either ARHB or NEMU should be used.