MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00285-016-0999-z

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of mathematical biology · 2016

Zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis transmission: modeling, backward bifurcation, and optimal control.

Zhao Songnian, Kuang Yan, Wu Chih-Hang, Ben-Arieh David, Ramalho-Ortigao Marcelo, Bi Kaiming

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a vector-borne disease caused by protozoan flagellates of the genus Leishmania, is transmitted by sand flies. After malaria, VL is the second-largest parasitic killer, responsible for an estimated 500,000 infections and 51,000 deaths annually worldwide. Mathematical models proposed for VL have included the impact of dogs versus wild canids in disease dissemination and models developed to assist in control approaches. However, quantitative conditions that are required to control or eradicate VL transmission are not provided and there are no mathematical methods proposed to quantitatively calculate optimal control strategies for VL transmission. The research objective of this work was to model VL disease transmission system (specifically Zoonotic VL), perform bifurcation analysis to discuss control conditions, and calculate optimal control strategies. Three time-dependent control strategies involving dog populations, sand fly population, and humans are mainly discussed. Another strategy sometimes used in attempts to control zoonotic VL transmission, dog culling, is also evaluated in this paper.

Для цитирования: Zhao Songnian, Kuang Yan, Wu Chih-Hang, Ben-Arieh David, Ramalho-Ortigao Marcelo, Bi Kaiming. Zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis transmission: modeling, backward bifurcation, and optimal control.. Journal of mathematical biology. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-0999-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.