European journal of ophthalmology · 2009
Why do patients with improved visual acuity drop out of RGP contact lens use? Ten-year follow-up results in patients with scarred corneas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ozkan Berna, Elibol Orhan, Yuksel Nursen, Altintas Ozgul, Karabas Levent, Caglar Yusuf
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses and to investigate the reasons for patient dissatisfaction with this therapy.
METHODS: Records of 17 patients (20 eyes) who started using RGP contact lenses for correction of irregular astigmatism due to scarred corneas between 1995 and 1996 were evaluated retrospectively. Best-corrected visual acuities with or without RGP contact lenses were noted. The mean duration of contact lens use, reasons for discontinuation of therapy, and treatment methods preferred over contact lens use were evaluated.
RESULTS: The irregular astigmatisms were induced by herpetic keratitis (3 eyes), corneal trauma (5 eyes), and previous corneal infections (12 eyes). All of the patients had increase in visual acuity with RGP contact lenses (p=0.000). At the end of the follow-up it was found that only one patient was still using RGP contact lenses (5%). The mean duration for contact lens use was 21.42+/-4.53 SE months (2-72 months). The reasons for dropping out contact lenses were intervening surgical procedures (57.8%), loss of patient motivation (26.3%), recurrent punctate epitheliopathy (10.5%), and herpes simplex keratitis reactivation (5.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: RGP contact lens use is a successful method of increasing visual acuity in scarred corneas. However, patients with good visual acuity in the fellow eye find it hard to remain motivated for RGP contact lens use in the unhealthy eye. Furthermore, patients prefer permanent treatment methods even though these methods would result in decreased visual acuity.
METHODS: Records of 17 patients (20 eyes) who started using RGP contact lenses for correction of irregular astigmatism due to scarred corneas between 1995 and 1996 were evaluated retrospectively. Best-corrected visual acuities with or without RGP contact lenses were noted. The mean duration of contact lens use, reasons for discontinuation of therapy, and treatment methods preferred over contact lens use were evaluated.
RESULTS: The irregular astigmatisms were induced by herpetic keratitis (3 eyes), corneal trauma (5 eyes), and previous corneal infections (12 eyes). All of the patients had increase in visual acuity with RGP contact lenses (p=0.000). At the end of the follow-up it was found that only one patient was still using RGP contact lenses (5%). The mean duration for contact lens use was 21.42+/-4.53 SE months (2-72 months). The reasons for dropping out contact lenses were intervening surgical procedures (57.8%), loss of patient motivation (26.3%), recurrent punctate epitheliopathy (10.5%), and herpes simplex keratitis reactivation (5.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: RGP contact lens use is a successful method of increasing visual acuity in scarred corneas. However, patients with good visual acuity in the fellow eye find it hard to remain motivated for RGP contact lens use in the unhealthy eye. Furthermore, patients prefer permanent treatment methods even though these methods would result in decreased visual acuity.