MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Chang Gung medical journal · 2008

The effects of CAM vision stimulator for bilateral amblyopia of different etiologies.

Huang Hsiu-Mei, Kuo Hsi-Kung, Fang Po-Chiung, Lin Hsiu-Fen, Lin Pei-Wen, Lin Sue-Ann

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the association between bilateral amblyopia and the effects of CAM vision stimulator.

METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out between January 1994 and July 2004. The 105 children enrolled were all younger than 7 years old and had bilateral amblyopia. All children wearing full-correction glasses regularly received CAM vision stimulation once per week. The patients' age, initial best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), final BCVA, and the number of CAM sessions needed to achieve a visual acuity (VA) > or = 0.8 were recorded.

RESULTS

The major cause of bilateral amblyopia was refractive error. In this study, the types of refractive error were classified as astigmatism (> 2.0D, 61 cases), hyperopia (> 3.0D, 17 cases), and myopia (> 4.0D, 12 cases). The myopic group showed significantly poorer visual outcomes than the other children after CAM treatment (p < 0.05). However, older children patients had better initial BCVA, and the hyperopic patients had the better outcomes in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

CAM treatment for bilateral amblyopia can achieve satisfactory improvement in 3 months in most instances. The myopic group and children younger than 4 years old had worse visual outcomes after CAM treatment.

Для цитирования: Huang Hsiu-Mei, Kuo Hsi-Kung, Fang Po-Chiung, Lin Hsiu-Fen, Lin Pei-Wen, Lin Sue-Ann. The effects of CAM vision stimulator for bilateral amblyopia of different etiologies.. Chang Gung medical journal. 2008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.