MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1022034

Медицинская библиотека · The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 1983

Two years experience with Medtronic-Hall prostheses in 75 patients with special reference to its thrombogenicity and hemolysis.

Schachner A, Deviri E, Yortner R, Levy M J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Seventy-five patients received 80 Medtronic-Hall valve prostheses during a 24-month period at the Beilinson Medical Center. The mean age was 50 years and the majority of patients had rheumatic heart disease. All operations were elective. There were 4 early and 2 late deaths (8%). Four patients needed re-operation for paravalvular leaks, 3 of them survived the second operation and one patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis did not. One patient was re-operated on successfully because of a mycotic aneurysm in the ascending aorta. Mild subclinical hemolysis (elevated SLDH and reduced haptoglobin) was found in the majority of patients. Hemolysis was found to be significantly lower in type D 16 prostheses patients. Mild hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 patients due to anticoagulant therapy. Three patients suffered from prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), 2 of them responded to prompt medical therapy. There were no thromboembolic episodes. Most surviving patients experienced marked postoperative improvement. Within the 24-month follow-up period, the Medtronic-Hall valve compared favorably with other disk or ball prostheses previously and currently used in our department.

Для цитирования: Schachner A, Deviri E, Yortner R, Levy M J. Two years experience with Medtronic-Hall prostheses in 75 patients with special reference to its thrombogenicity and hemolysis.. The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon. 1983. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1022034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.