Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2011
Comparison of 3 different methods to analyze ankle plantarflexor stiffness in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ross Sandy A, Foreman Matthew, Engsberg Jack R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare 3 different methods of measuring plantarflexor stiffness in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (CP) and children without disability.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Human performance laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with children with spastic diplegia (n=121; mean age, 8.4y) and children with typical development (TD) (n=48; mean age, 9.7y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure ankle plantarflexor stiffness at 10°/s using 3 methods: (1) end-range method, which applied a linear slope to the end of the torque-angle curve; (2) set-range method, which applied a linear slope from 30° to 10° plantarflexion; and (3) a linear method, which applied a slope only to the linear portion of the curve.
RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for group and stiffness method. The end-range method showed no significant difference between groups for plantarflexor stiffness (P=.62), the set-range method showed the CP group with 120% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.046), and the linear method showed the CP group with 35% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The linear method appeared to resolve the issues with the previous methods; applying a linear slope to a nonlinear curve or applying a linear slope to the same range of motion for each child regardless of their range limitations. It is clear that children with CP have limited range of motion; therefore, stiffness occurs earlier in the range than would be expected for a typically developing child. Using the linear method, children with CP were 35% stiffer in the ankle plantarflexors than typically developing peers.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Human performance laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with children with spastic diplegia (n=121; mean age, 8.4y) and children with typical development (TD) (n=48; mean age, 9.7y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure ankle plantarflexor stiffness at 10°/s using 3 methods: (1) end-range method, which applied a linear slope to the end of the torque-angle curve; (2) set-range method, which applied a linear slope from 30° to 10° plantarflexion; and (3) a linear method, which applied a slope only to the linear portion of the curve.
RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for group and stiffness method. The end-range method showed no significant difference between groups for plantarflexor stiffness (P=.62), the set-range method showed the CP group with 120% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.046), and the linear method showed the CP group with 35% greater stiffness than the TD group (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The linear method appeared to resolve the issues with the previous methods; applying a linear slope to a nonlinear curve or applying a linear slope to the same range of motion for each child regardless of their range limitations. It is clear that children with CP have limited range of motion; therefore, stiffness occurs earlier in the range than would be expected for a typically developing child. Using the linear method, children with CP were 35% stiffer in the ankle plantarflexors than typically developing peers.