MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0218492314532642

Медицинская библиотека · Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2014

Bronchial injuries in children: single-center experience.

Dib Osama Saber El, Kasem Ehab Mohammed

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience of the management of bronchial injuries in children.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2012, we diagnosed 11 cases of bronchial injuries in children and reviewed their records.

RESULTS

The age range was 3-12 years. Etiologies were passenger traffic accidents in 55%, pedestrian traffic accidents in 27%, and a fall from a height in 18%. Clinical manifestations were pneumothorax with continuous air leak in 81%, subcutaneous emphysema in 55%, and failure of lung expansion in 64%. Three (27%) cases were diagnosed late. All patients were operated on through a posterolateral thoracotomy. Main stem bronchial rupture was identified in the right side in 72% and in the left side in 28%. Bronchial repair was feasible in 7 (64%) cases, but resection was inevitable in 4 cases (3 pneumonectomies and one lobectomy). Two of the patients who required resection died; they had associated intraabdominal injuries. All survivors were discharged in stable condition without complications.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial injuries in children are rare and challenging. Clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopic examinations facilitate the diagnosis. Early diagnosis and bronchial repair offers favorable results. Delayed diagnosis, lung resection, and associated injuries adversely affect the outcome.

Для цитирования: Dib Osama Saber El, Kasem Ehab Mohammed. Bronchial injuries in children: single-center experience.. Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0218492314532642.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.