Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2006
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: use of cognitive evoked potential (P300) to predict treatment response.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sangal R Bart, Sangal Joanne M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of P300 in predicting treatment response to medicines in patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and to confirm previous reports that 31-electrode mean auditory P300 amplitude (AA) predicts response to atomoxetine; and right fronto-central to parietal AA ratio predicts response to methylphenidate.
METHODS: Efficacy and P300 data from 58 children with ADHD enrolled in a double-blind crossover study using atomoxetine and methylphenidate were analyzed. Robust response was defined as 60% decrease from baseline in the ADHD rating scale. Response was alternately defined as greater than 50% decrease.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment mean 31-electrode AA>6.8 microV predicted response to atomoxetine using both definitions of response. Right fronto-central to parietal AA ratio did not predict response to methylphenidate. A previous report that methylphenidate responders differed from non-responders in pre-treatment AA at T8 was confirmed, and AA at T8>7.65 microV predicted response to methylphenidate. 31-electrode mean P300 visual latency (VL) also predicted response to atomoxetine, as previously reported with imipramine.
CONCLUSIONS: Mean AA predicts response to atomoxetine in ADHD patients. AA at T8 predicts response to methylphenidate. Such predictive tools may allow individually tailored choice of medicine in treatment of ADHD.
SIGNIFICANCE: This allows a more informed decision of which medicine to use for a given patient.
METHODS: Efficacy and P300 data from 58 children with ADHD enrolled in a double-blind crossover study using atomoxetine and methylphenidate were analyzed. Robust response was defined as 60% decrease from baseline in the ADHD rating scale. Response was alternately defined as greater than 50% decrease.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment mean 31-electrode AA>6.8 microV predicted response to atomoxetine using both definitions of response. Right fronto-central to parietal AA ratio did not predict response to methylphenidate. A previous report that methylphenidate responders differed from non-responders in pre-treatment AA at T8 was confirmed, and AA at T8>7.65 microV predicted response to methylphenidate. 31-electrode mean P300 visual latency (VL) also predicted response to atomoxetine, as previously reported with imipramine.
CONCLUSIONS: Mean AA predicts response to atomoxetine in ADHD patients. AA at T8 predicts response to methylphenidate. Such predictive tools may allow individually tailored choice of medicine in treatment of ADHD.
SIGNIFICANCE: This allows a more informed decision of which medicine to use for a given patient.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acoustic StimulationAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMethylphenidatePredictive Value of TestsPropylaminesROC CurveReference Values