Clinical imaging · 2015
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute infarction of the brainstem and posterior fossa: comparison of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Byeon Jonghyun, Kim Jee Young, Cho A-Hyun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the diagnosis of acute infarction of the brainstem and posterior fossa, by comparing its results with those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with acute infarctions of the brainstem and posterior fossa underwent both ss-EPI and rs-EPI. Two readers independently assessed two sets of diffusion-weighted (DW) images for the qualitative comparison of image quality. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for the assessment of image parameters.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the conspicuity of acute infarction upon qualitative comparison; however, distinctions of anatomical structures, susceptibility artifact, the presence of uncertain high signal intensity in the brain parenchyma, and overall image quality were significantly better in rs-EPI DW images. There were no significant differences in SNR, lesion contrast, CNR, and apparent diffusion coefficient values of acute infarction and normal thalamus between rs-EPI and ss-EPI.
CONCLUSION: rs-EPI DWI is a clinically useful technique for evaluating lesions in the brainstem and posterior fossa by producing high-resolution DW images with reduced susceptibility artifact. However, there are no significant differences in the conspicuity of acute infarctions in the brainstem and posterior fossa between rs-EPI and ss-EPI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with acute infarctions of the brainstem and posterior fossa underwent both ss-EPI and rs-EPI. Two readers independently assessed two sets of diffusion-weighted (DW) images for the qualitative comparison of image quality. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for the assessment of image parameters.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the conspicuity of acute infarction upon qualitative comparison; however, distinctions of anatomical structures, susceptibility artifact, the presence of uncertain high signal intensity in the brain parenchyma, and overall image quality were significantly better in rs-EPI DW images. There were no significant differences in SNR, lesion contrast, CNR, and apparent diffusion coefficient values of acute infarction and normal thalamus between rs-EPI and ss-EPI.
CONCLUSION: rs-EPI DWI is a clinically useful technique for evaluating lesions in the brainstem and posterior fossa by producing high-resolution DW images with reduced susceptibility artifact. However, there are no significant differences in the conspicuity of acute infarctions in the brainstem and posterior fossa between rs-EPI and ss-EPI.