NeuroImage · 2025
Head to head: Comparing intracranial volumes using 3D ultrasound and fetal MRI.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Ooijen Inge M, van Iersel Gaby, Meijerink Lotte, Teeuw Jalmar, Turk Elise, Nijman Maaike, Cromb Daniel, Uus Alena, Counsell Serena, Bekker Mireille N, Tataranno Maria Luisa, Hulshoff Pol Hilleke E, de Zwarte Sonja M C, Benders Manon J N L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE(S): Recent advances in fetal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) enable automated intracranial volume (ICV) measurements. If US yields results comparable to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it could serve as a fast, cost-effective, and scalable alternative. This study directly compares and visualizes ICV measurements from fetal 3D US and 3D MRI.
STUDY DESIGN: We applied automated ICV segmentation to US and MRI data from healthy participants. In a subset of fetuses who underwent both US and MRI within 24 h, we evaluated ICV agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). As a proof of principle, we also generated a multimodal ICV trajectory incorporating fetal US, fetal MRI, and neonatal MRI.
RESULTS: Among the 71 participants, 47 had high-quality US scans at 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, 61 had high-quality fetal MRI, and 47 had high-quality neonatal MRI. Thirteen fetuses around 30 weeks had US and MRI scans acquired within 24 h, showing good agreement with an ICC of 0.797 and DSCUS-MRI scores of 0.900-0.925. Mean ICV values were 80 ± 12 ml around 22 weeks (US), 248 ± 28 ml around 30 weeks (US), 294 ± 36 ml around 32 weeks (fetal MRI) and 508 ± 51 ml around 43 weeks (neonatal MRI).
CONCLUSION(S): Fetal US and MRI yield comparable ICV measurements around 30 weeks of gestation, validating automatic 3D US volumetric methods. The use of 3D US may support development of normative curves and improve comparisons with at-risk fetuses, including in regions where fetal MRI is less accessible.
STUDY DESIGN: We applied automated ICV segmentation to US and MRI data from healthy participants. In a subset of fetuses who underwent both US and MRI within 24 h, we evaluated ICV agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). As a proof of principle, we also generated a multimodal ICV trajectory incorporating fetal US, fetal MRI, and neonatal MRI.
RESULTS: Among the 71 participants, 47 had high-quality US scans at 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, 61 had high-quality fetal MRI, and 47 had high-quality neonatal MRI. Thirteen fetuses around 30 weeks had US and MRI scans acquired within 24 h, showing good agreement with an ICC of 0.797 and DSCUS-MRI scores of 0.900-0.925. Mean ICV values were 80 ± 12 ml around 22 weeks (US), 248 ± 28 ml around 30 weeks (US), 294 ± 36 ml around 32 weeks (fetal MRI) and 508 ± 51 ml around 43 weeks (neonatal MRI).
CONCLUSION(S): Fetal US and MRI yield comparable ICV measurements around 30 weeks of gestation, validating automatic 3D US volumetric methods. The use of 3D US may support development of normative curves and improve comparisons with at-risk fetuses, including in regions where fetal MRI is less accessible.