Journal of athletic training · 2025
Combined Active and Passive Isothermic Heating Leads to Similar Core Temperature Compared With Exercise Alone.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wardenaar Floris C, Navarro Sonia, Caballero Rachel, Vento Kaila A, Kavouras Stavros A, Vanos Jenni
Аннотация
CONTEXT: The training stress of heat acclimatization optimizing exercise performance in a hot environment can be demanding.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficiency of different single heating protocols to elevate core temperature.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Laboratory.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ten male participants (age = 25 ± 3 years) performed 4 different 60-minute heating strategies at least 1 week apart.
INTERVENTIONS: Sixty minutes passive heating (PAS), 30 minutes active heating using a high-intensity bike protocol (HIBP) in a hot environment with 30 minutes passive heating (EH-PAS), 60 minutes HIBP in a hot environment (EH), or 60 minutes HIBP at room temperature (EM).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body core temperature and heart rate.
RESULTS: The highest peak gastrointestinal temperature occurred in EH-PAS (39.1 ± 0.4°C), followed by EH (38.9 ± 0.3°C), EM (38.4 ± 0.3°C), and PAS (38.1 ± 0.5°C). The average heart rate, measured as a control for intensity, was not different between exercise strategies (EH-PAS = 142 ± 12.3 beats per minute [bpm], EH = 146 ± 9.7 bpm, and EM = 142 ± 13.3 bpm; P > .05), but was different for PAS (98 ± 15.2 bpm; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding passive heating to a shorter exercise protocol can be just as effective in keeping core temperature elevated as exercise in the heat alone during a 60-minute session. Therefore, a single-bout combination of exercise and passive heating may result in a similar body temperature induction compared with exercise heat stress alone.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficiency of different single heating protocols to elevate core temperature.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Laboratory.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ten male participants (age = 25 ± 3 years) performed 4 different 60-minute heating strategies at least 1 week apart.
INTERVENTIONS: Sixty minutes passive heating (PAS), 30 minutes active heating using a high-intensity bike protocol (HIBP) in a hot environment with 30 minutes passive heating (EH-PAS), 60 minutes HIBP in a hot environment (EH), or 60 minutes HIBP at room temperature (EM).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body core temperature and heart rate.
RESULTS: The highest peak gastrointestinal temperature occurred in EH-PAS (39.1 ± 0.4°C), followed by EH (38.9 ± 0.3°C), EM (38.4 ± 0.3°C), and PAS (38.1 ± 0.5°C). The average heart rate, measured as a control for intensity, was not different between exercise strategies (EH-PAS = 142 ± 12.3 beats per minute [bpm], EH = 146 ± 9.7 bpm, and EM = 142 ± 13.3 bpm; P > .05), but was different for PAS (98 ± 15.2 bpm; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding passive heating to a shorter exercise protocol can be just as effective in keeping core temperature elevated as exercise in the heat alone during a 60-minute session. Therefore, a single-bout combination of exercise and passive heating may result in a similar body temperature induction compared with exercise heat stress alone.