The Journal of urology · 1987
Experience in vibratory and electro-ejaculation techniques in spinal cord injury patients: a preliminary report.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sarkarati M, Rossier A B, Fam B A
Аннотация
More than 90 per cent of complete spinal cord injury patients have major fertility problems, depending upon the site and type of injury. During the last 5 years 34 patients were treated by vibratory and/or electrostimulation at our center, and semen was produced in all but 5. In 8 patients ejaculation was attempted by vibratory stimulation alone and in 22 electrostimulation also was used. Vibratory stimulation is the easier and less cumbersome of the 2 methods. No major side effects were noted with either technique. Stimulation was performed by a rectal electrode incorporated in a silicone finger glove with a current of 0.1 msec. in duration, a frequency of 30 Hz. and an average of 60 volts. Vibratory stimulation was applied to the frenulum and/or glans penis with a specially constructed vibrator at a frequency of 80 Hz. and a peak-to-peak oscillation of 1.6 to 2.4 mm. Semen obtained during the first 6 months after injury was not of a quality consistent with successful fertilization owing to poor motility. However, semen quality and motility were better in patients who had been injured for more than 6 months. Repeated electro-ejaculation did not improve the quality of semen. The effects of bladder outlet surgery and autonomic blockers were noted in 5 patients.