Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2018
Continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea does not improve asthma control.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ng Susanna S S, Chan Tat-On, To Kin-Wang, Chan Ken K P, Ngai Jenny, Yip Wing-Ho, Lo Rachel L P, Ko Fanny W S, Hui David S C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Unrecognized obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) may lead to poor asthma control despite optimal therapy. We assessed asthma control, airway responsiveness, daytime sleepiness and health status at baseline and 3 months after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment among asthma patients with nocturnal symptoms and OSAS.
METHODS: Patients with nocturnal asthma symptoms despite receiving at least moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting bronchodilators underwent a home sleep study using 'Embletta' portable diagnostic system. Patients with significant OSAS (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥10/h) were randomized to receive either CPAP or conservative treatment for 3 months.
RESULTS: Among 145 patients recruited, 122 underwent sleep study with 41 (33.6%) having AHI ≥10/h. Patients with significant OSAS had higher BMI (27.4 (5.1) vs 25.1 (4.5) kg/m2 , P = 0.016), bigger neck circumference (36.6 (3.1) vs 34.8 (3.6) cm, P = 0.006) and lower minimum SaO2 (80.7 (6.6) vs 87.2 (3.9) %, P < 0.001). Using intention-to-treat analysis among 37 patients with AHI ≥10/h (CPAP group (n = 17) vs control group (n = 20)), there was no significant difference in Asthma Control Test score (CPAP 3.2 (2.7) vs control 2.4 (5.7), P = 0.568) but the CPAP group had a greater improvement in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (-3.0 (4.5) vs 0.5(3.8), P = 0.014), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (0.6 (0.8) vs 0.02 (0.7), P = 0.022) and vitality domain in the SF-36 questionnaire (14.7 (16.8) vs 0.3 (16.2), P = 0.012) after 3 months. Data are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.
CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of OSAS was found among patients with asthma and snoring. CPAP therapy for 3 months did not enhance asthma control but improved daytime sleepiness, quality of life and vitality.
METHODS: Patients with nocturnal asthma symptoms despite receiving at least moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting bronchodilators underwent a home sleep study using 'Embletta' portable diagnostic system. Patients with significant OSAS (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥10/h) were randomized to receive either CPAP or conservative treatment for 3 months.
RESULTS: Among 145 patients recruited, 122 underwent sleep study with 41 (33.6%) having AHI ≥10/h. Patients with significant OSAS had higher BMI (27.4 (5.1) vs 25.1 (4.5) kg/m2 , P = 0.016), bigger neck circumference (36.6 (3.1) vs 34.8 (3.6) cm, P = 0.006) and lower minimum SaO2 (80.7 (6.6) vs 87.2 (3.9) %, P < 0.001). Using intention-to-treat analysis among 37 patients with AHI ≥10/h (CPAP group (n = 17) vs control group (n = 20)), there was no significant difference in Asthma Control Test score (CPAP 3.2 (2.7) vs control 2.4 (5.7), P = 0.568) but the CPAP group had a greater improvement in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (-3.0 (4.5) vs 0.5(3.8), P = 0.014), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (0.6 (0.8) vs 0.02 (0.7), P = 0.022) and vitality domain in the SF-36 questionnaire (14.7 (16.8) vs 0.3 (16.2), P = 0.012) after 3 months. Data are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.
CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of OSAS was found among patients with asthma and snoring. CPAP therapy for 3 months did not enhance asthma control but improved daytime sleepiness, quality of life and vitality.