MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5014/ajot.35.1.26

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 1981

Duration and quality of the prone extension position in four-, six-, and eight-year-old normal children.

Harris N P

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study was designed to determine whether developmental changes occur in the duration and quality of maintaining a prone extension position. Three groups of 26 to 30 normal children ages 4, 6, and 8 years were tested on the prone extension position. Results indicated a significant difference in both duration of maintenance and quality between the performance of the four-year-olds and the other two age groups. No significant differences were found between the six- and eight-year-olds. Smooth assumption of the position and distance of thighs off the mat were found to be the most important factors in discriminating a good prone extension position from an inadequate one. The variability of performance by the four-year-olds indicates that the ability to assume and maintain a prone extension position is not a valid measurement tool for discriminating between normal children and those "at risk" for learning disabilities at this age level. The inability of children six years or older to maintain a "good" prone extension position for 30 seconds suggests a vestibular processing inefficiency.

Для цитирования: Harris N P. Duration and quality of the prone extension position in four-, six-, and eight-year-old normal children.. The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 1981. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.35.1.26.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.