The Journal of pediatrics · 2009
Stability of the factor structure of the metabolic syndrome across pubertal development: confirmatory factor analyses of three alternative models.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goodman Elizabeth, Li Chaoyang, Tu Yu-Kang, Ford Earl, Sun Shumei S, Huang Terry T-K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To test the fit and stability of 3 alternative models of the metabolic syndrome's factor structure across 3 developmental stages.
STUDY DESIGN: With data from the Fels Longitudinal Study, confirmatory factor analyses tested 3 alternative models of the factor structure underlying relationships among 8 metabolic syndrome-associated risks. Models tested were a 1-factor model (A), a 4-factor model (B), and a second-order latent factor model (C). Developmental stages assessed were prepuberty (ages 8-10), puberty (ages 11-15), and postpuberty (ages 16-20).
RESULTS: Convergence was achieved for all developmental stages for model A, but the fit was poor throughout (root mean square error of approximation > 0.1). Standardized factor loadings for waist circumference and body mass index were much stronger than those for fasting insulin at all 3 time points. Although prepuberty and postpuberty models converged for models B and C, each model had problems with Heywood cases. The puberty model did not converge for either model B or C.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothetical structures commonly used to support the metabolic syndrome concept do not provide adequate fit in a pediatric sample and may be variable by maturation stage. A components-based approach to cardiovascular risk reduction, with emphasis on obesity prevention and control, may be a more appropriate clinical strategy for children and youth than a syndromic approach.
STUDY DESIGN: With data from the Fels Longitudinal Study, confirmatory factor analyses tested 3 alternative models of the factor structure underlying relationships among 8 metabolic syndrome-associated risks. Models tested were a 1-factor model (A), a 4-factor model (B), and a second-order latent factor model (C). Developmental stages assessed were prepuberty (ages 8-10), puberty (ages 11-15), and postpuberty (ages 16-20).
RESULTS: Convergence was achieved for all developmental stages for model A, but the fit was poor throughout (root mean square error of approximation > 0.1). Standardized factor loadings for waist circumference and body mass index were much stronger than those for fasting insulin at all 3 time points. Although prepuberty and postpuberty models converged for models B and C, each model had problems with Heywood cases. The puberty model did not converge for either model B or C.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothetical structures commonly used to support the metabolic syndrome concept do not provide adequate fit in a pediatric sample and may be variable by maturation stage. A components-based approach to cardiovascular risk reduction, with emphasis on obesity prevention and control, may be a more appropriate clinical strategy for children and youth than a syndromic approach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAge FactorsBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCausalityChildCholesterol, HDLFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInsulinLongitudinal StudiesMaleMetabolic SyndromeModels, BiologicalPubertyRisk FactorsTriglyceridesWaist CircumferenceYoung Adult