Diabetes care · 2026
Housing Instability Associated With Cost-Related Nonadherence and Financial Toxicity in People With Uncontrolled Diabetes.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davis Victoria H, Mehdipanah Roshanak, Patel Minal R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of housing instability and its associations with cost-related nonadherence and financial toxicity among adults with uncontrolled diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed baseline randomized controlled trial data from 600 adults with uncontrolled diabetes and cost-related barriers to care. Logistic and linear regression assessed associations of housing instability with cost-related nonadherence and financial toxicity.
RESULTS: Half (n = 298) reported housing instability, which was associated with greater odds of cost-related nonadherence (adjusted odds ratio 1.64; 95% CI 1.05, 2.56) and worse financial toxicity (B = -4.64; 95% CI -6.20, -3.09). Cost-related nonadherence was not significant after adjusting for diabetes distress and symptoms of depression and anxiety; financial toxicity remained significant. In sensitivity analyses, worry about housing costs, not housing or utility needs, was associated with financial toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Housing instability was associated with financial toxicity and, in primary models, with cost-related nonadherence. Findings should be validated in longitudinal, nationally representative samples.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed baseline randomized controlled trial data from 600 adults with uncontrolled diabetes and cost-related barriers to care. Logistic and linear regression assessed associations of housing instability with cost-related nonadherence and financial toxicity.
RESULTS: Half (n = 298) reported housing instability, which was associated with greater odds of cost-related nonadherence (adjusted odds ratio 1.64; 95% CI 1.05, 2.56) and worse financial toxicity (B = -4.64; 95% CI -6.20, -3.09). Cost-related nonadherence was not significant after adjusting for diabetes distress and symptoms of depression and anxiety; financial toxicity remained significant. In sensitivity analyses, worry about housing costs, not housing or utility needs, was associated with financial toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Housing instability was associated with financial toxicity and, in primary models, with cost-related nonadherence. Findings should be validated in longitudinal, nationally representative samples.