MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/a0034259

Медицинская библиотека · Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2013

Risk, compensatory, protective, and vulnerability factors related to youth gambling problems.

Lussier Isabelle D, Derevensky Jeffrey, Gupta Rina, Vitaro Frank

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study explores the additive (i.e., risk or compensatory) or moderating (i.e., protective or exacerbating) role of individual resources (social bonding, personal competence, and social competence) and environmental risk (family, peers, and neighborhood) in regard to the association between established personal risk attributes (i.e., impulsivity, anxiety) and youth gambling problems. Using a cross-sectional design, regression analyses indicated that among a sample of mostly first-generation immigrant adolescents from low-income homes (N = 1,055; M = 15.03; SD = 1.64), social bonding was associated with a decrease in gambling problems (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15, p < .01) while peer and neighborhood risk were associated with an increase in gambling problems (OR = 2.24, p = .01 and OR = 2.31, p = .01, respectively), net of personal risk attributes. In terms of protective processes, no putative moderating effect was found for composite individual resources. The findings are discussed with respect to the roles of compensatory, risk, and protective processes.

Для цитирования: Lussier Isabelle D, Derevensky Jeffrey, Gupta Rina, Vitaro Frank. Risk, compensatory, protective, and vulnerability factors related to youth gambling problems.. Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors. 2013. DOI: 10.1037/a0034259.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.