Differential diagnosis of malignant intrahepatic tumors by ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy and by laparoscopic/intraoperative biopsy. A comparative study.

Thirty-six cases of ultrasonographically detected liver tumors (28 malignant and 8 benign lesions) were investigated by both fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and laparoscopic or intraoperative tissue biopsy. The sensitivity of FNA biopsy in detecting a neoplasm was 85.7% while that of tissue biopsy was 82.1%. Specificity was 100% in both methods. A correct histologic diagnosis of the neoplasm could be made on the cytologic smear in only 14 cases (50.0%) due to technical and methodologic difficulties. Endoscopic and intraoperative tissue biopsy yielded sufficient material to make a definite histologic tumor diagnosis in 23 of 28 cases. Additional information on tumor spread and sequelae of liver infiltration was obtained by macroscopic tissue observations in nine cases. These results indicate that FNA biopsy is less sensitive in the classification of primary or secondary liver tumors and that tissue biopsies obtained during laparoscopy or laparotomy are required if a suspected hepatic neoplasm needs to be classified exactly to plan therapy and to establish a prognosis.