MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2310/7750.2013.12114

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery · 2013

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): linguistic and cultural validation in Serbian.

Janković Slavenka, Vukićević Jelica, Djordjević Sanja, Janković Janko, Marinković Jelena, Erić Miloš

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) evaluates the impact of skin diseases on the patient's quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to translate and to validate the CDLQI into Serbian.

METHODS

The CDLQI was translated into Serbian following international recommendations for translation and cultural adaptation. The validation study was carried out on a large cohort of secondary schoolchildren who self-reported acne.

RESULTS

Translating the CDLQI consisted of forward translation, reconciliation, back translation, back-translation review, and cognitive debriefing. The good internal consistency of the scale was demonstrated with a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.87. A Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.66 between the CDLQI and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) was deemed satisfactory to demonstrate concurrent validity.

CONCLUSION

The translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric qualities of the CDLQI were satisfactory, enabling its application in clinical practice and future studies.

Для цитирования: Janković Slavenka, Vukićević Jelica, Djordjević Sanja, Janković Janko, Marinković Jelena, Erić Miloš. The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): linguistic and cultural validation in Serbian.. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.2310/7750.2013.12114.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.