Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita · 2020
Rehabilitation strategies for low anterior resection syndrome. A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bulfone Giampiera, Del Negro Francesca, Del Medico Elena, Cadorin Lucia, Bressan Valentina, Stevanin Simone
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence in the literature about rehabilitative treatments that reduce low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms in patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: We have search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health and Scopus databases. Studies selected were limited to those including only patient undergone low rectal resection with sphincter preservation and with pre-post assessment with a LARS score. Five articles fit the criteria.
RESULTS: The percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation demonstrated moderate results and sacral nerve stimulation was found to be the best treatment with greater symptom improvement. Only one study considered sexual and urinary problems in the outcomes assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice patients should evaluate with the LARS and other score for evaluation of urinary and sexual problems. Future research must be implemented with higher quality studies to identify the least invasive and most effective treatment/s.
METHODS: We have search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health and Scopus databases. Studies selected were limited to those including only patient undergone low rectal resection with sphincter preservation and with pre-post assessment with a LARS score. Five articles fit the criteria.
RESULTS: The percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation demonstrated moderate results and sacral nerve stimulation was found to be the best treatment with greater symptom improvement. Only one study considered sexual and urinary problems in the outcomes assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice patients should evaluate with the LARS and other score for evaluation of urinary and sexual problems. Future research must be implemented with higher quality studies to identify the least invasive and most effective treatment/s.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic AgentsColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDefecationExercise TherapyFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsLumbosacral PlexusMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRectumRetrospective StudiesSyndromeTibial NerveTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrination Disorders