American journal of clinical pathology · 2024
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) loss is a marker of malignancy in biliary neoplasms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gonzalez-Mancera Miguel S, Siref Andrew, Kosari Kambiz, Nissen Nicholas, Gaddam Srinivas, Hendifar Andrew, Osipov Arsen, Waters Kevin, Hutchings Danielle, Guindi Maha, Larson Brent K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Adenocarcinomas of the biliary tract frequently present diagnostic challenges because of their histologic overlap with benign and preinvasive lesions. The molecular profiles of biliary adenocarcinomas vary by anatomical location. Variations in IDH1/2, common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, can lead to defective production of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). Limited ancillary studies are available for biliary adenocarcinomas, and loss of 5-hmC staining could serve as a helpful ancillary diagnostic tool for biliary tract malignancies.
METHODS: We evaluated 93 cases-20 benign biliary lesions, 15 preinvasive biliary neoplasms, 46 invasive biliary carcinomas, and 12 pancreatic adenocarcinomas-for 5-hmC staining. Preoperative biopsies from 16 cases of biliary carcinoma were also stained. Sixteen nonneoplastic/reactive bile duct biopsies served as controls.
RESULTS: Loss of 5-hmC was seen in 41 of 46 (89.1%) biliary malignancies vs 0 of 20 benign tumors (P < .001), for a sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 100%, respectively. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma showed loss of 5-hmC in 11 of 13 (84.6%) cases, similar to the 30 of 33 (90.9%) cases in other biliary adenocarcinomas (P = .61). Similarly, 5-hmC loss was more frequent in distal bile duct adenocarcinomas than in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, at 15 of 17 (88.2%) vs 4 of 12 (33.3%), respectively (P = .0045). There was no difference in the frequency of 5-hmC loss in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy vs those who did not (90.9% vs 88.6%, P > .99). 5-hmC immunohistochemistry in preoperative biopsies was concordant with the resection specimen in 81.3% (13/16) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Loss of 5-hmC is not unique to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among biliary carcinomas, but is a useful diagnostic marker differentiating malignancies of the biliary tree from benign mimics.
METHODS: We evaluated 93 cases-20 benign biliary lesions, 15 preinvasive biliary neoplasms, 46 invasive biliary carcinomas, and 12 pancreatic adenocarcinomas-for 5-hmC staining. Preoperative biopsies from 16 cases of biliary carcinoma were also stained. Sixteen nonneoplastic/reactive bile duct biopsies served as controls.
RESULTS: Loss of 5-hmC was seen in 41 of 46 (89.1%) biliary malignancies vs 0 of 20 benign tumors (P < .001), for a sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 100%, respectively. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma showed loss of 5-hmC in 11 of 13 (84.6%) cases, similar to the 30 of 33 (90.9%) cases in other biliary adenocarcinomas (P = .61). Similarly, 5-hmC loss was more frequent in distal bile duct adenocarcinomas than in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, at 15 of 17 (88.2%) vs 4 of 12 (33.3%), respectively (P = .0045). There was no difference in the frequency of 5-hmC loss in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy vs those who did not (90.9% vs 88.6%, P > .99). 5-hmC immunohistochemistry in preoperative biopsies was concordant with the resection specimen in 81.3% (13/16) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Loss of 5-hmC is not unique to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among biliary carcinomas, but is a useful diagnostic marker differentiating malignancies of the biliary tree from benign mimics.