MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00784-010-0428-4

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical oral investigations · 2010

Mannose-binding lectin gene (MBL-2) polymorphism in oral lichen planus.

Barkokebas Andreza, de Albuquerque T Carvalho Alessandra, de Souza Paulo Roberto Eleutério, Gomez Ricardo Santiago, Xavier Guilherme Machado, Ribeiro Camila Maria Beder, Crovella Sergio, Porter Stephen Ross, Leão Jair Carneiro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

TNF-α may be associated with the etiopathogenesis of oral lichen planus (OLP), and it has been suggested that polymorphism of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) increases the in vitro production of TNF- α. The aim of the present study was to assess the relevance of genetic diversity of MBL in OLP. The study sample comprised 90 individuals, 45 OLP patients and 45 healthy volunteers. MBL-2 gene was amplified using real-time PCR. Frequency of A/A genotype was 55.6% in OLP and 53.3% in healthy volunteers. Likewise, A/0 heterozygote genotype was found in 42.2% and 35.6%; 2.2% and 11.1%, had the recessive 0/0 genotype respectively. Frequencies of the "A" and "0" alleles were 77% and 23% in the OLP group and 71.2% in control group. There were no statistically significant differences regarding genotype frequency (p = 0.546) or allele frequency (p = 0.497). In conclusion, no significant association was found between polymorphism of MBL-2 gene and OLP.

Для цитирования: Barkokebas Andreza, de Albuquerque T Carvalho Alessandra, de Souza Paulo Roberto Eleutério, Gomez Ricardo Santiago, Xavier Guilherme Machado, Ribeiro Camila Maria Beder, Crovella Sergio, Porter Stephen Ross, Leão Jair Carneiro. Mannose-binding lectin gene (MBL-2) polymorphism in oral lichen planus.. Clinical oral investigations. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0428-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.