The Journal of emergency medicine · 2015
Retrospective Evaluation of Two Fast-track Strategies to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Real-life Chest Pain Population.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schønemann-Lund Martin, Schoos Mikkel Malby, Iversen Kasper, Hansen Steen I, Thode Jørgen, Clemmensen Peter, Steffensen Rolf
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline on non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (N-STE ACS) proposed a new ACS rule-out protocol.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate this new tool, which uses diagnostic levels of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT; > 14 ng/L) in a slightly modified version and compare this to a recently proposed approach using undetectable levels of hs-TnT to rule out patients.
METHODS: There were 534 consecutive patients with suspected ACS included. Protocol 1: symptom duration, hs-TnT at 0 and 6-9 h, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and symptom status at 6-9 h. Protocol 2: a single blood sample of hs-TnT. The primary endpoint was a discharge diagnosis of ACS by blinded adjudication. Secondary endpoints were ACS re-admission < 30 days and 1-year mortality.
RESULTS: Protocol 1 classified 434/534 (81%) patients, with 27.9% being ruled out. All myocardial infarctions were correctly ruled in, but 15 cases of unstable angina were missed, resulting in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 87.3% (79.6-92.5%) and 87.6% (80.4-92.9%), respectively. Protocol 2 ruled out 17.5% of the population, yielding a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 94.1% (88.2-97.6%) and 90.8% (81.9-96.2%), respectively. Both protocols correctly ruled in 2/3 patients with ACS re-admission < 30 days and 55/56 1-year fatalities.
CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the diagnostic value of a modified version of the ESC rule-out protocol (Protocol 1) in N-STE ACS patients, but also suggests that a simpler protocol using undetectable levels of hs-TnT (Protocol 2) could provide a similar or even superior sensitivity.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate this new tool, which uses diagnostic levels of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT; > 14 ng/L) in a slightly modified version and compare this to a recently proposed approach using undetectable levels of hs-TnT to rule out patients.
METHODS: There were 534 consecutive patients with suspected ACS included. Protocol 1: symptom duration, hs-TnT at 0 and 6-9 h, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and symptom status at 6-9 h. Protocol 2: a single blood sample of hs-TnT. The primary endpoint was a discharge diagnosis of ACS by blinded adjudication. Secondary endpoints were ACS re-admission < 30 days and 1-year mortality.
RESULTS: Protocol 1 classified 434/534 (81%) patients, with 27.9% being ruled out. All myocardial infarctions were correctly ruled in, but 15 cases of unstable angina were missed, resulting in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 87.3% (79.6-92.5%) and 87.6% (80.4-92.9%), respectively. Protocol 2 ruled out 17.5% of the population, yielding a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 94.1% (88.2-97.6%) and 90.8% (81.9-96.2%), respectively. Both protocols correctly ruled in 2/3 patients with ACS re-admission < 30 days and 55/56 1-year fatalities.
CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the diagnostic value of a modified version of the ESC rule-out protocol (Protocol 1) in N-STE ACS patients, but also suggests that a simpler protocol using undetectable levels of hs-TnT (Protocol 2) could provide a similar or even superior sensitivity.