MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.ico.0000121712.36593.0d

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2004

Penetrating keratoplasty in Nepal.

Tabin Geoffrey C, Gurung Rita, Paudyal Govinda, Reddy Harsha S, Hobbs Cara L, Wiedman Michael S, Ruit Sanduk

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To identify indications and outcomes in a large series of penetrating keratoplasty surgeries performed in Nepal.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 472 consecutive penetrating keratoplasty surgeries (408 patients) performed at Tilganga Eye Center, Kathmandu, Nepal from June 1994 to September 1999.

RESULTS

Mean recipient age was 39.2 years (+/- 19.7 years). Main indications for PKP were corneal scar (37%), adherent leukoma (35%), perforation or impending perforation (9%), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (6%), keratoconus (4%), and aphakic bullous keratopathy (3%). Mean duration of follow-up was 27.6 +/- 25.1 months. Sixty-five percent of available grafts were clear at 6 months, and 70% of available grafts were clear at 3 years. Six months postoperatively, 15% of patients had acuity better than 6/18, 37% had acuity between 6/18 and 6/60, and 17.7% had acuity between 6/60 and 3/60. Common causes of graft failure were endothelial failure (43%), increased intraocular pressure (15%), ulcer (14%), and trauma (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The corneal diseases and indications for transplant surgery in Nepal are different from those in the Western world. Despite these differences, penetrating keratoplasty is a successful and reasonable way to reduce corneal blindness in developing nations.

Для цитирования: Tabin Geoffrey C, Gurung Rita, Paudyal Govinda, Reddy Harsha S, Hobbs Cara L, Wiedman Michael S, Ruit Sanduk. Penetrating keratoplasty in Nepal.. Cornea. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000121712.36593.0d.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.